Historiosophy of the Enlightenment and Romanticism as a foreword of the origin of ideas about the social image of the people in the eastern Slavic historiography of the late XVIII – middle of the XIX century

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Yuriy Mykhayluk

Анотація

Abstract. Introduction. The formation of “social history” as a separate area of research in the historiography of the Russian Empire has come a complicated and long way. In order to have a clear understanding of this process, it is important to identify the factors that determined it. First of all, we are talking about the theoretical and methodological foundations of the development of East Slavic historiography of the late XVIII - mid XIX centuries, on the basis of which the research field of “social history” was soon outlined.

Purpose. The aim of the article is to find out the historiosophical origins of social history as a scientific direction in East Slavic historiography.

Results. The article clarifies the influence of Enlightenment and Romantic historiosophy on the awareness of historians of the East Slavic region of the need to study the history of the people in its various aspects.

It is established that the spread of enlightenment ideas among historians of the late XVIII - first decades of the XIX century. stimulated them in their works to go beyond the traditional framework of state historiography and to include in the research issues components of the internal life of the people.

The romantic reaction to the enlightenment canons and schemes led to the emergence in historiography to the forefront along with the traditional leading historical images of the state and its rulers come out (partly replace) various ethnopsychological segments of the history of the people concerning language, traditions and customs, culture, religion, psychology, life values. This methodology of historiography laid the foundations for further delineation of social images in the subject field of scientific studies.

Originality. The novelty of scientific research is that in this perspective, the problem of the origins of social history is considered in historiography for the first time.

Conclusion. The study of the “internal” history of the people in the Enlightenment and subsequent romantic ideas about the historical past, including addressing the problem of “nationality”, contributed to the segmentation of the field of history of the people / nation, forced to delve into unknown features of its internal and external forms . In such conditions during the end of the XVIII - middle of the XIX century. in scientific circles, among other things, formed an awareness of the need to comprehend social images and the emergence of social landmarks of historical studies.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Розділ
Статті

Посилання

Yas, O. V. (2012). Traditions of great historical narratives in the light of cultural epochs of the end of XVIII – XX centuries. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal (Ukrainian Historical Journal), 5, 6-38 (in Ukr.)

Litvinov, V. D. Enlightenment. Retrieved from http://www.history.org.ua (in Ukr.)

Gorsky, V. (2002). Enlightenment. Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary. Kyiv: Abrys (in Ukr.)

Voltaire. (1998). Philosophy and Methodology of History. Historians and History: Life. Fate. Creativity: a collection of biographical information. (volume 2, pp. 46-75). Moscow: Ostozhye (in Rus)

Grinin, L. E. (2010). Theory, methodology and philosophy of history: essays on the development of historical thought from antiquity to the middle of the XIX century. Filosofiya i obschestvo (Philosophy and Society), 4, 145-197 (in Rus)

Shapiro, A. L. (1993). Russian historiography from ancient times until 1917. Textbook. Moscow: Publishing house «Culture» (in Rus)

Simonovsky, P. I. (1847). Brief description of the Cossack Little Russian people and their military affairs. Moscow: At the University Printing House (in Rus)

Shcherbatov, M. M. (1896). Reflections on the nobility. Works of Prince M. M. Shcherbatov. Volume One Political writings (pp. 219-268). St. Petersburg: Partnership «Pechatnya S.N. Yakovleva» (in Rus)

Shcherbatov, M. M. (1896). Statistics in the discussion of Russia. Works of Prince M. M. Shcherbatov. Volume One Political writings (pp. 457-618). St. Petersburg: Partnership «Pechatnya S.N. Yakovleva» (in Rus)

Boltin, I.N. (1788). Notes on the history of ancient and current Russia, the city of Leclerc. St. Petersburg: Typography Mining College (in Rus)

Miller, G.F. (1846). Historical writings about Little Russia and Little Russians. Moscow: At the University Printing House (in Rus)

Miller, G.F. (1791). Description of pagan peoples living in the Kazan province, like Cheremis, Chuvash and Votyakov. St. Petersburg (in Rus)

Rigelman, A. (1846). The story or story of the Don Cossacks. Moscow: At the University Printing House (in Rus)

Rigelman, A. (1847). Annalistic narrative of Little Russia, its people and Cossacks in general. Moscow: At the University Printing House (in Rus)

Chulkov, M.D. (1781-1788). The historical description of Russian commerce at all ports and borders from ancient times to the present, and all the prevailing legalizations of the sovereign Emperor Peter the Great and the now safely reigning empress Empress Catherine the Great: In 7 vols. St. Petersburg: Printing House of the Imperial Academy of Sciences (in Rus)

Krestinin, V. (1784). Historical beginnings about the Dvina people of ancient, middle, new and modern times. St. Petersburg: Printing House of the Imperial Academy of Sciences (in Rus)

Krestinin, V. (1785). Historical experience. About rural ancient house-building of the Dvina people in the north. St. Petersburg: Printing House of the Imperial Academy of Sciences (in Rus)

Krestinin, V. (1790). Inscription of the history of the city of Kholmogor. St. Petersburg: Printing House of the Imperial Academy of Sciences (in Rus)

Krestinin, V. (1792). A brief history of the city of Arkhangelsk. St. Petersburg: Printing House of the Imperial Academy of Sciences (in Rus)

Bogdanov, A. I. (1779). Historical, geographical and topographical description of St. Petersburg, from the beginning of its establishment, from 1703 to 1751. St. Petersburg: Printing house of the Military College (in Rus)

Markovich, Ya. M. (1798). Notes on Little Russia, its inhabitants and works. Part One. St. Petersburg: Under the Provincial Board (in Rus)

Berlinsky, M. (1820). Short description of Kiev. St. Petersburg: At the Printing House of the Department of Public Education (in Rus)

Berlinsky, M.F. (1991). History of the city of Kiev. Kyiv: Scientific Thought (in Ukr)

Bantysh-Kamensky, D. (1830). History of Lesser Russia, Moscow: In the Printing House of Semen Selivanovsky (in Rus)

Doroshenko, D. (1991). Essay on the history of Ukraine: in 2 volumes. Kyiv: Globe (in Ukr)

Lazarevsky A. (1894, December). Former prospectors of Little Russian antiquity. Kyevskaia staryna (Kiev antiquity), 349-387 (in Rus)

Kolesnyk, I.I. (2000). Ukrainian historiography (XVIII - early XX century). Kyiv: Geneza (in Ukr)

Yas, O. (2006). «History of Little Russia» by D. Bantysh-Kamensky in the light of research tools. Ukrainskyi arkheohrafichnyi shchorichnyk (Ukrainian Archaeographic Yearbook), 10/11, 343-361 (in Ukr)

Bantysh-Kamensky, D. (1830). History of Lesser Russia: In 3 hours. Part 3: From the election of Mazepa to the destruction of Hetmanism. Moscow: In the Printing House of Semen Selivanovsky (in Rus)

Dolenga-Khodakovsky, Z. Ya. (1820). Project of a scientific trip across Russia. Syin Otechestva (Son of the Fatherland), 33, 291-312. (in Rus)

Dolenga-Khodakovsky, Z. Ya. (1820). Project of a scientific trip across Russia. Syin Otechestva (Son of the Fatherland), 40, 289-299 (in Rus)

Volodin, A. A. (2012). The project of a scientific trip to Russia Z. Ya. Dolengi-Khodakovsky in the first quarter of the nineteenth century. Vestnik Ryazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. S.A. Esenina (Bulletin of Ryazan State University), 1, 77-86 (in Rus)

Perevezentsev, S. (2018). «On the construction of the day and otnyu: to the question of the significance of traditionalism in Russian history. Tetradi po konservatizmu: Almanah (Conservatism Notebooks), 1, 243-254 (in Rus)

Karamzin, N. M. (1818-1829). History of the Russian state. St. Petersburg: Printing house of N. Grech (in Rus)

Rudkovskaya, I. E. (2014). Personified time in the historiographic tradition of the late Enlightenment. Dialog so vremenem (Dialogue over time), 47, 21-35 (in Rus)

Karamzin, N. M. (1818). History of the Russian state. V. 1. St. Petersburg: Printing House of N. Grech (in Rus)

Gerasimenko, G. A. (2002). History of Russian historical science (pre-October period): Textbook. Orenburg: Orenburg Book Publishing House (in Rus)

Kozlov, V. P. (1989). «History of the Russian State» N. M. Karamzin in the assessments of contemporaries. Moscow: Nauka (in Rus)

Boyarchenkov, V.V. (2009). Historical science in Russia of the 1830-1870s: the search for a new concept of Russian history: dis … Doctr. Sciences: 07.00.09. Ryazan (in Rus)

Sapchenko, L. A. (2011). N. M. Karamzin in the assessment of the authors of the Moscow Telegraph. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk (Bulletin of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences), 13, 2, 445-449 (in Rus)

Teslya, A. A. (2016). «Russian people» and «Russian state»: N.A. Polevoy vs N.M. Karamzin. Tetradi po konservatizmu: Almanah (Conservatism Notebooks), 4, 81-95 (in Rus)

Polevoy, N. A. (1825). On the latest criticisms of the «History of the Russian State», composed by Karamzin. Moskovskiy telegraf (Moscow Telegraph),15, 234-243 (in Rus)

Polevoy, N. A. (1829). History of the Russian state. Composition N.M. Karamzin. Moskovskiy telegraf (Moscow Telegraph), 12, 467-500 (in Rus)

Polevoy, N. (1829). History of the Russian people: vol. 1. Moscow: In the Printing House of August Seeds (in Rus)

Milyukov, P. (1913). The main trends of Russian historical thought. Third edition. St. Petersburg: Edition M.V. Averyanova (in Rus)

Polevoy, N. (1829-1833). History of the Russian people. Moscow: In the Printing House of August Semen (in Rus)

Khalyavin, N.V. (2017). Historiography of the history of Russia (pre-revolutionary period): lecture course. Izhevsk: Publishing Center «Udmurt University» (in Rus)

Ustryalov, N. (1836). About the system of pragmatic Russian history. St. Petersburg: Printing house of L. Snegirev and Co. (in Rus)

Chizhevsky. D. (2005). Philosophy create. Vol. 1. Kyiv: Smoloskip (in Rus)

Borovska, I. (2013). Imbued with ideas of romanticism on the historical concept of Thomas Carlyle (1795–1881). Ukraina – Yevropa – Svit. Mizhnarodnyi zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Seriia: Istoriia mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn. 11, 176-179 (in Ukr)

Yakovenko, N. M. (2007). Entrance to history. Kyiv: Criticism (in Ukr)

Badalyan, D. A. (2006). The concept of «nationality» in Russian culture of the XIX century. Istoricheskie ponyatiya i politicheskie idei v Rossii XVI–XX vv.: Sb. nauch. rabot. Seriya «Istochnik. Istorik. Istoriya» (Historical concepts and political ideas in Russia of the XVI – XX centuries: Sat. scientific works. Series «Source. Historian. History»), 5, 108-122 (in Rus)

Badalyan, D. (2018). «Official nationality» or nationality? S. S. Uvarov and A. S. Khomyakov. Tetradi po konservatizmu: Almanah (Conservatism Notebooks), 1, 51-66 (in Rus)

Shiryants, A. (2018). «Theorist of official nationality»: M. P. Pogodin and the triune formula of S. S. Uvarov. Tetradi po konservatizmu: Almanah (Conservatism Notebooks), 1, 219-232 (in Rus)

Sugako, N. A. (2006). Substantiation of the theory of «official nationality» in the works of M. P. Pogodin. Pratsyi gіstaryichnaga fakulteta, 1, 266-270 (in Rus)

Uvarov, S. S. (2010). Report on the review of Moscow University (December 4, 1832). Selected Works (pp. 294-313). Moscow: ROSSPEN (in Rus)

Wortman, R. (1999). «Official Nationality» and the national myth of the Russian monarchy of the XIX century. RUSSIA / RUSSIA. Vol. 3 (11): Cultural practices in an ideological perspective. Russia, XVIII - the beginning of the twentieth century (pp. 234-244). Moscow: OGI (in Rus)

Pogodin, M. (1871). For the biography of Count Semyon Sergeevich Uvarov. His correspondence with M.P. Pogodin with the latest explanations. Russkiy arhiv (Russian archive), XII, 2078-2112 (in Rus)

Kuzhilin, A. V. (2005). Historical views of N. G. Ustryalov: dis. ... candidate ist. sciences: 07.00.09. Moscow (in Rus)

Logvinova, I. Yu. (2019). F. Samarin, MP P. Pogodin, S. P. Shevyryov and the idea of nationality. Tetradi po konservatizmu: Almanah (Conservatism Notebooks), 2, 68-73 (in Rus)

Bobrovskikh, E.V. (2015). Importance of «nationality» in the concept of Slavophiles. Problemnyiy analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie (Problem analysis and public administration design), 4, 101-106 (in Rus)

Bobrovskikh, E. V. (2015). The theory of the «official» and «unofficial» nationality: S.S. Uvarov and Slavophiles. Vestnik Moskovskogo Gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoricheskie nauki (Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University), 5, 183-190 (in Rus)

Bobrovskikh, E.V. (2016). The concept of «nationality» in the history of socio-political thought of Russia of the XIX century: dis. ... the candidate is watered. Sciences: 23.00.01. Moscow (in Rus)

Kostomarov, N. (1861). Two Russian nationalities. Osnova (The basis), 3, 33-80 (in Rus)

Kostomarov, N. (1861). True to the Poles about Russia. Osnova (The basis), 10, 100-112 (in Rus)

Kostomarov, N. (1861). True Muscovites about Russia. Osnova (The basis), 10, 1-15 (in Rus)

Dashkevich, N. P. (1884). The struggle of cultures and nationalities in the Lithuanian-Russian state during the dynastic union of Lithuania with Poland. Universitetskie Izvestiya (University News), 10, 269-316 (in Rus)