The Ukrainian State of the mid XVII century as a heir to Prince Rus’: A view of Vyachеslav Lypinski
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Анотація
Introduction. The article attempts to uncover V. Lipinski’s contribution to the study of the problems of forming the basic provisions of the Ukrainian state idea in the middle of the seventeenth century, which is not covered in the historiography and the awareness of Hetman B. Khmelnitsky and his associates of the genetic connection of the Hetmanate with Rus in the IX-XIII centuries and the kingdom of King Danylo. The scientist revealed these questions in the monographs "Stanislav-Mikhail Krychevsky" in the 1912 edition and in "Ukraine is at the Turning Point" published in 1921.
Purpose. The purpose of the article is to highlight the contribution of V. Lipinski in the study of the process of formation of Hetman B. Khmelnytsky and his immediate surroundings of the provisions of the state idea and their understanding of the succession of the Hetmanate from Rus IX-XIII centuries and the Ukrainian kingdom of King Danylo.
Results. The attempt of V. Lypynsky to find out the time when the idea of restoration of the independent Ukrainian state in the form of republic the Zaporizhia Army originated in the environment of Hetman B. Khmelnitsky and his immediate surroundings was considered. The views of the researcher on its development in the conditions of opposition to Jagiellonian legitimism - recognition by the population of Ukrainian (Russian) lands of the legitimacy of the power of the Polish king and his claims in these territories are covered. The article draws attention to the fact that V. Lipinskiy, for the first time in historiography, tried to cover the question of the continuance and succession of the state idea formulated by B. Khmelnytsky and his immediate surroundings. He regarded the figure of the hetman as the creator of the new Ukrainian state, which became the heir to Rus in the IX-XIII centuries and the kingdom of King Danylo. The historian’s views on the motivation and steps of B. Khmelnitsky aimed at unification of ethnic Ukrainian lands are revealed. In his opinion, the idea of heredity of the Hetmanate from Rus came up because of the Ukrainian nobles who were among the Hetman’s surroundings . The scientist claimed, the desire of the elders to extend their authority to all Ukrainian territories was "quite natural" because a large part of them derived their ancestry. To justify his opinion, he quoted the words of the general clerk I. Vyhovsky to the Swedish ambassador Welling at the beginning of 1657: “We want to have under our rule all the ancient Ukraine or Rus, where the Orthodox faith was and where else our language was delayed:down to the Vistula River... Because we would be ridiculed if we did not take away the lands now / we / had lost in ancient times. " On the heredity idea of restoration of the Ukrainian state in the XVII century from ancient times modern historiography asserts. Attention is drawn to V. Lipynsky’s understanding of the role of the Orthodox clergy in the process of forming the foundations of the Ukrainian state idea of the mid-seventeenth century.
Conclusion. Therefore, there are reasons to assert that V. Lipynskyi was one of the first in historiography to raise and attempt to cover the issue of the emergence of the basic provisions of the Ukrainian state idea of the mid-seventeenth century; emphasized its continuity and gravity since the time of the Russian Empire and the kingdom of King Daniel.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Посилання
Bilas, L. (1991) V’iacheslav Lypyns’kyj iak istoryk kryzovoi doby. Lypyns’kyj, V. K. Tvory. (Vol. 3). Filadel’fiia. [in Ukrainian].
Hudzenko, P. P. & Comps. (1953). Vossoedinenie Ukrainy s Rossiej. Dokumenty i materialy v trekh tomakh. (Vol. 2). Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Аkademii nauk SSSR. [in Russian].
Hrushevs’kyj, M. (1990). Iliustrovana istoriia Ukrainy. [Repryntne vidtvorennia vydannia 1913 roku]. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Hrushevs’kyj, M. (1997). Istoriia Ukrainy-Rusy. (Vol. 9, В. 2). Kyiv: Nauk. Dumka. [in Ukrainian].
Hrushevskyj, M. (1906). Ocherk ystoryy ukraynskoho naroda. Sankt-Peterburh: Typohrafyia tovaryschestva “Obschestvennaia pol’za”. [in Ukrainian].
Doroshenko, D. (2007). Moi spomyny pro nedavnie mynule (1914–1920 roky): Naukovo-populiarne vydannia. Kyiv: Tempora. [in Ukrainian].
Drahomanov, M. (2007). Ystorycheskye pesny malorusskoho naroda s ob’iasnenyiamy Vl. Antonovycha y M. Drahomanova. In Drahomanov M. Vybrani pratsi (Vol. 2: Fol’klorystyka. Literaturoznavstvo). Kyiv: Znannia Ukrainy. [in Russian].
Instytut rukopysu Natsional’noi biblioteky Ukrainy im. V. I. Vernads’koho. F. II: Istorychni materialy. Spr. 13698–13716. Teky Narushevycha, tt. 144–162. Dokumenty h. ch. uriadovoho pokhodzhennia, istorychno perevazhno politychnoi istorii do istorii Rosii, Pol’schi, Ukrainy, Shvetsii, Turechchyny, Krymu, a pochasty takozh i inshykh krain Yevropy 1650–1667 rr. Kopii (rr. 1920–1930). Zrobleno v Krakovi / Mova pol’s’ka i latyns’ka, 1131 ark, Spr. 13698, 26 ark. [in Ukrainian].
Instytut rukopysu Natsional’noi biblioteky Ukrainy im. V. I. Vernads’koho. F. X : Vseukrains’ka Akademiia nauk (VUAN) (1918-1933). Arkhiv i kolektsiia dokumentiv XVI–XX st. Spr. 5303. Klymenko V. Avtobiohrafiia. 16 sichnia 1918 r. Kopiia mashynop., 1 ark. [in Ukrainian].
Klymenko, P. (1923). [Rets. na] Lypyns’kyj V. Istorychni studii ta monohrafii. T. III. Ukraina na perelomi (1657–1659). Zamitky do istorii ukrains’koho derzhavnoho budivnytstva v XVII-im stolitti. Kyiv, Viden’ 1920. 304 s. Zapysky istorychno-filolohichnoho viddilu VUAN – Notes of the VUAN Historical and Philological Department, 2/3., 239–246. [in Ukrainian].
Kravchenko, V. (2003). Kontseptsii Pereiaslava v ukrains’kij istoriohrafii. In P. Sokhan’ (Ed.), Pereiaslavs’ka rada 1654 roku (istoriohrafiia ta doslidzhennia) (рр. 463–523). Kyiv: Smoloskyp. [in Ukrainian].
Lypyns’kyj, V. (1954). Ukraina na perelomi. 1657–1659. Zamitky do istorii ukrains’koho derzhavnoho budivnytstva v XVII-im stolittiu. [Vydannia druhe. Fotodruk z 1-ho vydannia («Dniprosoiuz», Kyiv–Viden’ 1920)]. N’iu-Jork: Vydavnytstvo «Bulava». [in Ukrainian].
Lypyns’kyj, V. K. (1980). Tvory. (Vol. 2: Uchast’ shliakhty u velykomu ukrains’komu povstanni pid provodom het’mana Bohdana Khmel’nyts’koho). Filadel’fiia-Pensyl’vaniia. [in Ukrainian].
Lypyns’kyj, V. K. (1991). Tvory. (Vol. 3: Ukraina na perelomi 1657–1659. Zamitky do istorii ukrains’koho derzhavnoho budivnytstva v XVII-im stolitti). Filadel’fiia. [in Ukrainian].
Mytsyk, Yu. (1996). Natsional’no-vyzvol’na vijna ukrains’koho narodu seredyny XVII st. v opinii povstantsiv. Kozats’ki vijny XVII stolittia v istoriohrafichnij svidomosti pol’s’koho ta ukrains’koho narodiv. Materialy Druhoi Pol’s’ko-Ukrains’koi Naukovoi Zustrichi (L’viv, 12–13 zhovtnia 1995 r.) – Cossack wars of the seventeenth century in the historiographical consciousness of the Polish and Ukrainian peoples. Proceedings of the Second Polish-Ukrainian Scientific Meeting (Lviv, October 12-13, 1995), 37–42. [in Ukrainian].
Montrezor, A. (1931). V’iacheslav Lypyns’kyj. In V. Lypyns’kyj iak ideoloh i polityk (рр. 5–13). Uzhhorod: Drukarnia knyhopechatnoho aktsijnoho tovarystva «Unio». [in Ukrainian].
Pelens’kyj, Ya. (1991). Peredmova. V’iacheslav Lypyns’kyj i joho „Ukraina na perelomi” // In Lypyns’kyj, V. K. (1991). Tvory. (Vol. 3, pp. IX–XIV). Filadel’fiia. [in Ukrainian].
Pelens’kyj, Ya. (1992). V’iacheslav Lypyns’kyj – zasnovnyk derzhavnyts’koi shkoly v ukrains’kij istoriohrafii. Ukrains’kyj istorychnyj zhurnal – Ukrainian Historical Journal, 2, 139–141. [in Ukrainian].
Perederij, I. (2009). Rol’ hromads’ko-politychnoi diial’nosti V. Lypyns’koho u formuvanni joho naukovo-istorychnoi kontseptsii. ”Hileia (naukovyj visnyk)”: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ – Gilea (scientific bulletin): Collection of scientific works, 22, 31–45. [in Ukrainian].
Smolij, V. A., & Stepankov, V. S. (1997). Ukrains’ka derzhavna ideia XVII–XVIII stolit’: problemy formuvannia, evoliutsii, realizatsii. Kyiv: ”Al’ternatyvy”. [in Ukrainian].
Smolij, V., & Stepankov, V. (2009). Bohdan Khmel’nyts’kyj. Sotsial’no-politychnyj portret: naukove vydannia. Kyiv: Tempora. [in Ukrainian].
Stepankov, V. S. (2000). Formuvannia novoi kontseptsii Ukrains’koi revoliutsii XVII st. (pratsi V’iacheslava Lypyns’koho ”Stanislav Mykhajlo Krychevs’kyj” ta "Ukraina na perelomi”. 1657–1659»). Ukraina v Tsentral’no-Skhidnij Yevropi. Studii z istorii XI–XVIII stolit’, 272–284. [in Ukrainian].
Dziuba, I. M. & Comps. (2008). Ukraina: antolohiia pam’iatok derzhavotvorennia, X–XX st. u 10 t. (Vol. 3: Bytva za Kozats’ku derzhavu). Kyiv: Vyd-vo Solomii Pavlychko "Osnovy”. [in Ukrainian].
Fedoruk, Ya. (1993). Zovnishn’opolitychna diial’nist’ Bohdana Khmel’nyts’koho i formuvannia joho politychnoi prohramy (1648 – serpen’ 1649 rr.). L’viv. [in Ukrainian].
Fedoruk, Ya. (1996.). Doslidzhennia Khmel’nychchyny v ukrains’kij istoriohrafii XX st. (do 1939 r.). Kozats’ki vijny XVII stolittia v istoriohrafichnij svidomosti pol’s’koho ta ukrains’koho narodiv. Materialy Druhoi Pol’s’ko-Ukrains’koi Naukovoi Zustrichi (L’viv, 12–13 zhovtnia 1995 r.) – Cossack wars of the seventeenth century in the historiographical consciousness of the Polish and Ukrainian peoples. Proceedings of the Second Polish-Ukrainian Scientific Meeting (Lviv, October 12-13, 1995), 208–212. [in Ukrainian].
Fedoruk, Ya. (2007). Knyhozbirni ta arkhivy Dmytra Doroshenka: slidamy odnoho inskryptu V’iacheslava Lypyns’koho. Ukrains’kyj arkheohrafichnyj schorichnyk – Ukrainian Archeographic Yearbook, 12, 271–298. [in Ukrainian].
Chukhlib, T. V. (2014). Proekt ”Kozats’koho kniazivstva” – istorychna al’ternatyva politychnoho ustroiu Het’manschyny. Ukrains’kyj istorychnyj zhurnal – Ukrainian Historical Journal, 4, 71–93. [in Ukrainian].
Shevchuk, V. (1995.). Kozats’ka derzhava. Kyiv: Abrys. [in Ukrainian].
Yas’, O. (1997). Problema naukovoi tradytsii i suchasna ukrains’ka istoriohrafiia [The problem of scientific tradition and contemporary Ukrainian historiography]. Sotsial’no-istorychni dystsypliny: pytannia teorii ta metodyky. Zbirka naukovykh prats’ na poshanu d. i. n. Marii Dmytriienko – Socio-historical disciplines: issues of theory and methodology / Collection of scientific works in honor of Doctor of History Maria Dmitrienko, 252–263. [in Ukrainian].
Yas’, O. (2003). Obrazy Pereiaslava v ukrains’kij istoriohrafii akademichnoi doby (pochatok XIX – kinets’ 80-kh rokiv XX stolittia). In P. Sokhan’ (Ed.), Pereiaslavs’ka rada 1654 roku (istoriohrafiia ta doslidzhennia) (рр. 524–604). Kyiv: Smoloskyp. [in Ukrainian].