Temporary occupation of Crimea and the attempt to implement the “Russian spring” project: the role of destructive information influences

Main Article Content

Yu. Nikolaiets

Abstract

Abstract. The article defines the content and nature of destructive influences in the information space during the temporary occupation of Crimea and the attempt to implement the “Russian spring” project in 2014. It outlines the methods of forming pro-Russian sentiments in Ukraine based on the ideological framework of the “Russian world” and identifies the population groups most vulnerable to destructive informational influences. The role of destructive informational influences in preparing and implementing the aggressive plans of the Russian Federation against Ukraine is highlighted. The purpose of the study is to characterize the destructive informational influences of the Russian Federation against Ukraine in 2014 during the temporary occupation of Crimea and the attempt to implement the “Russian spring” project. The scientific novelty lies in outlining, for the first time, the means of destructive informational influence by the Russian Federation at the onset of the modern Russian-Ukrainian war and identifying countermeasures, considering the conditions of information dissemination in Ukraine and the level of media literacy among its population. Conclusions. The author establishes that the ideological basis of destructive informational influences at the beginning of the Russian-Ukrainian war was the concept of the “Russian world,” which implied loyalty primarily to the leadership of the Russian Federation and the policies it pursued. It is highlighted that the population groups most vulnerable to hostile informational influences were older generations, whose socialization occurred primarily during the Soviet era. One of the outcomes of the information war against Ukraine was the temporary occupation of Crimea, which occurred with extremely limited armed resistance from Ukraine. The informational support for the “Russian Spring” relied on “socio-economic,” “political,” and “military” destructive components. However, the means of information warfare failed to ensure the implementation of the “Russian spring” project, which aimed at bringing southern and eastern Ukraine under the control of the aggressor. It was found that the value orientations of Ukrainian citizens became a significant obstacle to the realization of the enemy’s aggressive plans, which led to the use of regular army units to expand the zone of temporary occupation.

Article Details

Section
Статті
Author Biography

Yu. Nikolaiets

Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Political Culture and Ideology, Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

References

References

Gerasimov, V. (2013). The value of science in foresight. Voenno-promy`shlenny`j kur`er [Military-industrial courier], 8 (476), February 27 – March 5 [in Russian].

Kahneman, D. (2018). Thinking, fast and slow. Moscow [in Russian].

Thaler, R. (2018). Behavioral economics: how emotions influence economic decisions. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Kislow, D. V. (2010). Political security of mass communications. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Kislow, D. V. (2013). Information wars: monograph. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Gorbulin, V. (2019). My path to the looking glass: not just travel notes. Kyiv [in Russian].

Kulyk, V. (2020). Analyzing analytics: on the principles of studying western scientific and expert-analytical publications on the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. In Interpretations of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in western scientific and expert-analytical works. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Bekeshkina, I. (2015). Donbas – 2015: Some problems of regional reintegration. Ukrainske suspilstvo: monitorynh sotsialnykh zmin. [Ukrainian society: monitoring social change], 2 (16), 40–61 [in Ukrainian].

Kostenko, N. (2018). Compression of media skepticism contexts. Media: on the edge of truth and suspicion. Ukrainian society: monitoring social change. [Ukrainian society: monitoring social change], 5 (19), 362–371 [in Ukrainian].

(2016). On the second anniversary of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Kotyhorenko, V., Rafalskyi, O. (2013). The ideological project of the “Russian world” and the political preferences and inclinations of the population of Ukrainian Donbas. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen im. I. F.Kurasa NAN Ukrainy [Scientific notes of the I. F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies, NAS of Ukraine], 5 (67), 53–76 [in Ukrainian].

Khotyn, R. (2022). “Russian World”, “Victory frenzy”, “Rashism”. What ideologies is the Kremlin fighting for in Ukraine? Radio Svoboda [Radio Liberty]. 2022, May, 5. URL: https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/rosiya-ukrayina-viyna-ruskiy-mir-pobedobesiye-rashyzm/31835603.html [in Ukrainian].

Dugin, A. (1997). Foundations of geopolitics. The geopolitical future of Russia. Moscow [in Russian].

(2013). Diseases of history. URL: http://dkr.com.ua/index.php?new=12275 [in Russian].

Ivanov, A. (2010). The nicotine of nationalism and Tabachnyk. Doneczkij kryazh [Donetsk ridge], March, 19–25 [in Russian].

Ivanov, A. (2010). Bandera-European incompatibility. Doneczkij kryazh [Donetsk ridge], March, 5–11 [in Russian].

Nabok, S. (2017). Memory politics in modern Ukraine: problems of formation and controversial consequences. In Ethnopolitical context of sociocultural transformations in modern Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

(2020). The return of Crimea, November, 11. RBK [RBC]. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/story/5422d35dcbb20f2aadd4faa0 [in Russian].

(2023). The history of the creeping annexation of Crimea: February 2014–2023, March, 16. Tsentr protydii dezinformatsii [Center for countering disinformation]. URL: https://cpd.gov.ua/articles/istoriya-povzuchoyi-aneksiyi-krymu-lyutyj-2014-2023-roky [in Ukrainian].

Romanenko, M. (2014). “What “annexation”? It was Ukraine that occupied Crimea from 1954 to 2014!”. Regnum [Regnum]. URL: https://regnum.ru/news/polit/3295323.html [in Russian].

Artemiev, M. (2015). Federalization of Ukraine: solution or problem? February, 16. RBK [RBC]. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/opinions/politics/16/02/2015/54e1c25b9a79474dda16d282 [in Russian].

(2014). Reverse strike: how Ukraine learned to do without Russian gas, October, 9. RBK [RBC]. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/business/09/10/2014/543658cacbb20fba1b2f6c89 [in Russian].

(2018). Russia threatens to reach Kyiv: “These are ancestral Russian lands”, November, 29. Antikor [Antikor]. URL: https://antikor.com.ua/articles/272460-v_rf_grozjatsja_dojti_do_kieva_eto_iskonno_russkie_zemli [in Russian].

(2014). Putin stated that he wants guarantees for the “residents of Novorossiya” – Kharkiv, Donetsk..., April, 17. Ukrainska pravda [Ukrainian pravda]. URL: https://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/04/17/7022779 [in Ukrainian].

Nabok, S. (2020). The alternative reality of Kremlin propaganda: the conflict “in Ukraine” in Russian political, media, and scientific discourse. Interpretations of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict in western scientific and expert-analytical works. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

(2015). Donbas in the system of national information security: regional features, external challenges, tools to combat anti-Ukrainian propaganda: analytical report. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

(2014). Patriarch Kirill considers those who want to “tear southern and western Russian lands from the unified “Russian world” as enemies, March, 14. URL: http://risu.org.ua/ua/index/all_news/orthodox/moscow_patriarchy/55715 [in Ukrainian].

Ruchka, A. (2014). Value metamorphosis in the mentality of Ukrainian citizens during the extraordinary events of 2014. Ukrainian society: monitoring social change. Vol. 1. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Shulha, O. (2014). The end of the vacuum of legitimate values in Ukrainian society? Ukrainian society: monitoring social change. Vol. 1. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Prybytkova, I. (2014). Ukraine in the regional-civic and national-linguistic dimension during times of change. Ukrainian society: monitoring social change. Vol. 1. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Nikolaets, Yu. (2014). Ethnopolitical context of mass media discourse. Donbas in the ethnopolitical dimension. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

(2014). Ukrainians oppose federalization – study, March 3. Interfax-Ukraina [Interfax-Ukraine]. URL: https://ua.interfax.com.ua/news/general/194120.html [in Ukrainian].