Victoria Hron


The article substantiates the chronological boundaries of the separation of the totalitarianism in the structure of the planetary political system. The dialectical connection between the indicated process, the evolution of the institution of the state and the development of the world's ideological, political, and socio-economic space is studied.

The author draws attention on the fact that almost simultaneously with totalitarianism on the European ideological horizon concepts of an open (global) society appeared. This fact is considered as an ideological expression of the parallel development of national and supranational structures, which were formed on two different economic platforms. This refers to industrial production and international financial circuits.

By comparing the approaches to solving the problem, it was assumed that some of the elements of a globalist project were present in the ideological political system of the USSR of the 1920's. But they were eliminated in the early 1930's.

Also, during the study, the thesis on the mobilization nature of totalitarian regimes was specified. According to the author, the indicated mobilization was carried out through the function of «producer» and was predetermined by the dependence of production on the qualified labor force.

The peculiarities of the ideological superstructure of totalitarian states have been deduced from the urgent need to restore the sacredness of the state power in view of the danger of loss of sovereignty.


Totalitarianism; anti-Semitism; imperialism; racism; nationalism; national state; supranational structures


Baran, V. (1996). The Theory of Totalitarianism: genesis and essence sutnist. Suchasnist. 9, 57-66. (in Ukr.)

Vonsovych, S.H. (2004) The Theoretical Models of Totalitarianism and Their Evolution. Politolohichnyi visnyk. Zb. Nauk. Prats. – K.: TOV «XXI STOLITTIA: DIALOH KULTUR»,. – Vyp. 16. – P 100-109. (in Ukr.)

Demianenko, B.L. (2000). Tree Models of Totalitarianism: Comparative Analysis of Fascism, Bolshevism and National-Socialism.. Monohrafiia. K.: Nelen, 254. (in Ukr.)

Chabanna, M.V. (2007). Investigation of the Essential Features of the Totalitarian Regime and the Comparison of its Varieties within the Theory of Totalitarianism. Naukovi zapysky Ha UKMA. Ser. Polit, Nauky. 69, 11-16. (in Ukr.)

Haeyk, F. A. fon The Road to Slavery [Electronic Resource] / Friederich August fon Hayek. – Regime to access: http://www.e-reading.club/chapter.php/102575/6/fon_Hqijek_-_Doroga_k_rabstvu.html (in Russ.)

Arendt, H. (1996 The Origins of Totalitarianism. M.: Tsentrkom, 627. (in Russ.)

Lypynskyi, V. (1925). Religion and Church in the History of Ukraine. Philadlphia: Drukarnia «Ameryka», 110 (in Russ.)

Starosol’skii, V. (1998). The Theory of Nation. Kyiv, 157. (in Russ.)

Kautsky, K. (1990). The Origin of Christianity. M.: Politizdat,. – 463 p. (in Russ.)

Coudehove Kalerg,i R. N. (1932). Bolshevism and Europe (Stalin i Кº) / R. N. Coudehove Kalergi. Berlin, Riga: Izdatelstvo B. Lammei, 79 (in Russ.)

Katasonov, V. Yu. Central Bank – the Main Child and The Crown of Bourgeois Revolution [Electronic Resource] / V. Yu. Katasonov. Regime to access: http://www.kramola.info (in Russ.)

Braudel, F. (1988). Material Civilization, Economy and Capitalism in the XV – XVIII centuries Fernand Braudel. M.: Progress, 2, 218 (in Russ.)

Coudehove Kalergi, R. N. Practical Idealism [Electronic Resource]. Regime to access: http://balder.org/couru (in Russ.)

Fromm, E. (2000). Love of Life. Erich Fromm. M.: «Firma «Izdatielstvo AST», 400 p. (in Russ.)

Naishul, V. (1998). Preface to the Russian Edition Haeyk F. A. fon Chastnyie dienhi. M.; Izdatielstvo «Natsionalnyi Institut Modeli Ekonomiki», 240 p. (in Russ.)

Shlapentokh, D. (2017). The Proto-Totalitarian State. Punishment and Control in Absolut Regimes / Dmitry NY.: Taylor & Francis. 167. (in Eng.)

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.
2014 22   29 Том 328
2015 9   22 29
2016 1   02 3-4
2017 1 2 3 4
2018 1 2 3-4


Journal Content