Archaeology and Ethnos: methodological aspects of the reconstruction of Slavic ethnogenesis
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Анотація
Abstract. Introduction. Contemporary historiography in Eastern Europe is still held captive by a significant number of historical myths. One of them is as if the real existence from the Bronze Age of the so-called «ethnos of Slavs». In the article are analyzed the methodological aspects of the Slavic ethnogenesis reconstruction proposed by contemporary archaeologists within post-Soviet historiography.
Purpose. One factor in the extension of the Soviet scientific tradition today is the reluctance of a large part of scholars to rethink the methodological and theoretical foundations of such ethnohistorical reconstructions. We are trying to show this inertia of archeologists in today’s futile attempts to reconstruct the «ethnogenesis of Slavs».
Results. It has been determined the weak level of modern understanding by archeologists of the phenomenon of polydisciplinarity and impossibility to applicate the integrated approach in the field of Slavs ethnogenesis at the present stage. It has been described the incorrectness of the methods in archaeological study in modern Ukrainian, Russian and Belarusian historiography. It is noted that archaeological culture never reflects the ethnic identity of fossil antiquities in a wide range. Thatїs why, the verification of the ethnohistorical past by means of archaeological materials and techniques is inaccurate and most likely wrong. The methodological arsenal of archaeology is quite vulnerable and cannot give clear, consistent conclusions about the ethnic identity of the members of particular archaeological cultures.
The greatest theoretical problem of archeology is the still unexplained correlation of concepts and phenomena such as «archeological culture» and «ethnos». Attempts to impose an archeological culture on a particular ethnic group are also unjustified. The methodological problem remains the disregarding of living culture specifics by archaeologists (so-called «ethnoarchaeology»). The attitude towards this feature of contemporary East-Slavic historiographies by Western experts and archeologists has also been analysed. Their concepts can significantly improve the heuristic possibilities of Eastern European historiographies in exploring the ethnic past Eastern Slavs communities.
Conclusion. Contemporary archeology should change its attitude to methodological and theoretical orientations as soon as possible, in particular in an interdisciplinary format.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Посилання
Horowitz, D. (1985). Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London.
Smith, A. D. (1986). The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford.
Connor, W. (1994). Ethno-Nationalism: the quest for understanding. Princeton University Press.
Smith, A. D. (2004). Nationalism: theory, ideology, history. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Braychevsky, M. (1989). The eternal problem. Vsesvit [Universe], 5, 173-179. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Eriksen, T. (2014). What is anthropology? Moscow. (in Russ.)
Klein, L. (1988). Synthesis strategy in ethnogenesis research (integration of sciences and synthesis of sources in solving ethnogenesis problems). Soviet ethnography, 4, 13-23. Moscow. (in Russ.)
Klein, L. S. (1993). The phenomenon of Soviet archeology. St. Petersburg. (in Russ.)
Izmailov, I. (2014). Archeological culture and medieval ethnic community: theoretical and methodological problems of correlation (on the example of medieval Bulgaria). Volga archeology, 3, 138-178. (in Russ.)
Zhuk, A., Tikhonov, S., Tomilov, N. (2003). Introduction to ethnoarchaeology: a textbook. Omsk. (in Russ.)
Kenig, A. V. (2010). Ethnoarchaeology as a method of archaeological reconstructions (on the example of the Taz Selkups). Ekaterinburg. (in Russ.)
Klein, L. S. (1991). Archeological typology. Leningrad. (in Russ.)
Klein, L. S. (2018). Culture and evolution. Theoretical research. St. Petersburg. (in Russ.)
Ilhamov, A. (2005). Post-Soviet ethnography, myth-making and power. Ab Imperio, 4, 327-336. Kazan. (in Russ.)
Belova, T. (ed.) (2011). Archeology of Belarus. Encyclopedia. Vol. 2. Minsk. (in Belar.)
Martynau, V. (1996). Ethnogenesis of Slavs: Language and Myth. Heritage [Spadchyna], 4, 164-182. Minsk. (in Belar.)
Rassadin, S. E. (2005). Milograd culture: area, chronology, ethnos. Minsk. (in Russ.)
Zagorulsky, E. M. (2012). Slavs: origin and settlement in Belarus. Minsk. (in Russ.)
Titov, V. (2011). The ethnic situation in Belarus in the Iron Age. Grandfathers [Dedy]: digest of publications on Belarusian history, 6, 44-59. Minsk. (in Russ.)
Lysenko, P. F. (1999). Turov land. IX – XIII centuries. Minsk. (in Russ.)
Rassadzin, S. (1992). Ethnos of southern Belarus in fictional times. In: Pages of Belarusian history. Minsk. (in Belar.)
Arlov, U. (2003). Country Belarus: An Illustrated History. Martin: Neografia. (in Belar.)
Makushnikov, O. A. (2009). Homel-Dniepr-region in the V – mid. XIII centuries: socio-economic and ethnocultural development. Homel. (in Russ.)
Stanko, V. (1997). Preface. In: P. Tolochko (ed.) Ancient History of Ukraine, vol. 1. Primitive society. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Otroshchenko, V. (2008). Mythologizing the Ethno-Genesis of Ukrainians. In: New myths and fakes about the origin of Ukrainians. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Baran, V. (ed.) (1990). Slavs of Southeastern Europe in the pre-state period. Kyiv. (in Russ.)
Formozov, A. A. (2003). The oldest stages of the history of European Russia. Moscow. (in Russ.)
Halsall, G. (2013). Ethnicity and early medieval burial grounds. Russian archaeological yearbook, 3, 460-478. (in Russ.)
Klein, L. S. (2013). Ethnogenesis and archeology. Vol. 1. Theoretical research. St. Petersburg. (in Russ.)
Klein, L. S. (2007). Ancient migrations and the origin of Indo-European peoples. (Manuscript). St. Petersburg. URL: http: // www.archaeology.ru. (in Russ.)
Klein, L. S. (2010). Centaur Time. Steppe ancestral home of the Greeks and Aryans. St. Petersburg. (in Russ.)
Medvedev, A. P. (2002). On the initial stage of the ethnic history of the Slavs in the Don region. Historical notes: scientific works of the history department of Voronezh State University, 8, 195-207. Voronezh. (in Russ.)
Shchukin, M. (1999). The phenomenon of the Chernyakhov culture of the era of Constantine-Constance, or what is the Chernyakhov culture? Stratum plus, 4, 66-101. St. Petersburg, Kishinev, Odessa. (in Russ.)
Klein, L. (1998). Archeological culture: theoretical analysis of practice (instead of review). Russian archeology, 1, 187-194. (in Russ.)
Pachkova, S. (2003). The origin of the Slavs. Archeology, 4, 135–139. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Burdo, N., Videiko, M. (2007). Trypillian Culture: Memories of the Golden Age. Kharkiv. (in Ukr.)
Nalyvaiko, S. (2007). Ethnic History of Ancient Ukraine. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Sedov, V. V. (1994). Slavs in antiquity. Moscow. (in Russ.)
Sedov, V. V. (2002). Slavs: Historical and archaeological research. Moscow. (in Russ.)
Sedov, V. V. (1999). Migration is ready in the Black Sea region. In: B. Floria (ed.) Gennadios: on the 70th anniversary of Academician G. Litavrin. Moscow. (in Russ.)
Lesman, Yu. (2014). The Scandinavian component of Old Russian culture. Stratum plus, 5, 43–87. (in Russ.)
Yablonsky, L. (2013). Problems of the concept of ethnogenesis at the present stage of the development of humanitarian knowledge. In: V. Mosin, L. Yablonsky (ed.) Ethnicity in archeology or archeology of ethnicity? Chelyabinsk. (in Russ.)
Schnirelman, V. (2013). Ethnicity in Archeology - Reality or Phantom? In: V. Mosin, L. Yablonsky (ed.) Ethnicity in archeology or archeology of ethnicity? Chelyabinsk. (in Russ.)
Pachkova, S. (1994). On the degree of similarity of artifacts of latenic archeological cultures. In: P. Tolochko et al. (ed.) Antiquities of Rus-Ukraine. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Rychkov, M. (1993). «Cultural Communities» or «Communities of Archeological Cultures»? Archeology, 1, 82-91. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Koncha, S. (2014). The Place of Ukraine in the World Civilization Space: Approaches to Building a Scientific Paradigm. Bulletin of the Kyiv National University T. Shevchenko. Series of Ukrainian Studies, 1 (17), 5-10. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Braychevsky, M. (2009). Khozaria and Rus. In: Favorites. Vol. 2. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Maksymov, Ye. (1994). Ethnogenesis of Slavs in the Light of Archeological Sources of Ukraine III-I millennium BC. Archeology, 4, 69-83. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Karplyuk, G. (2003). Historiography of the study of the relation of Slavic ethnicity and archeological cultures. Magisterium, 11, 59–63. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Videyko, M. (2015). Ethno-social transformations in Central and Southeastern Europe V-IV millennium BC. Dissertation of doctor of sciences (history). Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Videiko, M. (2009). Ukraine: from Ants to Rus’. Kyiv. (in Russ.)
Kozak, D. (2002). Velbar Culture: Goths or Gepids? Archeology, 3, 7-17. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Baran, V. (2003). Some tendencies of development of material culture of Slavic-Wendens on the territory of Ukraine in the first half of the first millennium BC. In: V. Baran et al. (ed.). Antiquity I millennium BC on the territory of Ukraine. Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Vakulenko, L. V. (2010). Ukrainian Carpathians in Late Roman times (ethnocultural and socio-economic processes). Kyiv. (in Ukr.)
Curta, F. (2010). The Making of the Slavs. History and Archaeology of the Lower Danube Region, c. 500–700. Cambridge University Press.
Curta, F. (2004). The Slavic lingua franca (linguistic notes of an archeologist turned historian). East Central Europe, 31, 125-148.
Barford, P. (2008). Slavs beyond Justinian’s frontiers. Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana, 2, 21–32.
Curta, F. (2002). From Kossina to Bromley: ethnogenesis in Slavic archaeology. In: A. Gillett (ed.). On Barbarian Identity: Critical Approaches to Ethnicity in the Early Middle Ages. Turnhout: Brepols.
Curta, F. (2014). Ethnic Identity and Archaeology. Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. In: C. Smith (ed.). New York: Springer.
Curta, F. (2006). Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500–1250. Cambridge University Press.
Curta, F. (2011). Medieval Archaeology and Ethnicity: Where are We? History Compass, 9/7, 537-548.
Brather, S. (2002). Ethnic Identities as Constructions of Archaeology: the Case of the Alamanni. In: A. Gillett (ed.). On Barbarian Identity: Critical Approaches to Ethnicity in the Early Middle Ages. Turnhout: Brepols; Brather, S. (2011). Ethnizität und Mittelalterarchäologie. Eine Antwort auf Florin Curta. Zeitschrift für Archäologie des Mittelalters, 39, 161-172; Curta, F. (2007). Ethnicity in medieval archaeology. Early Medieval Europe, 15, 165-175. Harlow; Curta, F. (2013). The elephant in the room. A reply to Sebastian Brather. Ephemeris Napocensis, 23, 163-174.
Klein, L. S. (2018). Dialogues. Theoretical archeology and more. St. Petersburg. (in Russ.)
Garipzanov, I., Geary, P., Urbaсczyk, P. Introduction: Gentes, Gentile Identity and State Formation in Early Medieval Europe. In: Franks, Northmen, and Slavs: Identities and State Formation in Early Medieval Europe. Turnhout: Brepols.
Geary, P. J. (2002). The Myth of Nations: the Medieval Origins of Europe. Princeton University Press.
Hall, J. M. (1997). Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge University Press.
Curta, F. (2006). Tworzenie Słowian. Powrót do słowiańskiej etnogenezy. In: P. Urbańczyk (red.). Nie-Słowianie o początkach Słowian. Poznań.