CRIMINAL LEGISLATIVE DOCUMENTS ISSUE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT BODIES AT THE BEGINNING OF HITLER OCCUPATION (EXAMPLE OF KYIV CITY ADMINISTRATION DOCUMENTATION)
During the occupation social life went on, after all, families were formed and divorced, children were born and people died, crimes and offenses were committed. Therefore, both German and local authorities had to settle these issues. And the use of the Soviet or German legal basis was impossible for various reasons. That is why local managers focused their attention on the creation of a new legal regulatory framework which could provide the basis for adequate functioning of Ukrainian society. Consequently, the purpose of this publication is to analyze the activities of local authorities in creating a normative base for the regulation of offenses, which were approaching crimes or were criminal from the legal point of view.
The problem outlined has not yet been sufficiently considered in contemporary historiography, and the Soviet researchers were not interested in it at all. The exceptions are some publications and monographs of O. Honcharenko and M. Kunitsky, V. Shaikan, Y. Levchenko and Y. Oliynyk, although the works are related mostly to the systems of legal proceedings established by the occupation administration on the captured Ukrainian lands.
In the autumn of 1941 Kyiv City Administration developed the draft of Temporary Criminal Code of Kyiv. The draft was divided into General and Special Parts, and to 9 sections, which contained the definition of certain types of most widespread crimes and provided punishments for them.
In general, analyzing the draft of Criminal Code created by Kyiv City Administration, one can conclude that it was not complete and integral. Not all types of crimes were mentioned in this draft. The most severe punishments were determined for the crimes against the state, only for this type of offenses the death penalty was provided. For example, the murder with all the aggravating circumstances was penalized by the largest term of 10 years imprisonment. The draft identified also the types of complicity, aggravating and mitigating circumstances, and the stages of the crime commission. The certain crimes committed repeatedly were considered an aggravating circumstance and it increased their punishment significantly. There were 8 types of punishment, the most widespread of which were forced works and imprisonment for 1 to 10 years terms.
Honcharenko O. (2009). The functioning of the legal departments of local government in the system of proceedings of the Reichskommissariat «Ukraine» (1941 – 1944 rr.). Chasopys ukrainskoi istorii (A journal of Ukrainian history). Kyiv. 14. 78 – 82. (in Ukr.)
Honcharenko O. (2009). Judiciary and administrative practice of institutions of the occupation administration of the Reichskommissariat «Ukraine» in the sphere of the termination of family ties (1941–1944 rr.). Chasopys ukrainskoi istorii (A journal of Ukrainian history). Kyiv. 16. 59–64. (in Ukr.)
Honcharenko O. (2010). Institute of Legal Advisers in the System of Proceedings of the Reichskommissariat «Ukraine» (1941–1944 rr.). Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni M.P. Drahomanova. Zb. naukovykh prats. Yuvileinyi vypusk do 175–richchia Natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni M.P. Drahomanova. (Scientific journal of NPU named after MP Drahomanov Coll. scientific works. Anniversary edition of the 175th anniversary of the National Pedagogical University named after MP Drahomanov). Kyiv. 6. 120–125. (in Ukr.)
Honcharenko O. (2010). Everyday life of the Ukrainian population through the prism of the documents of judicial proceedings of the civilian administration organs of the Reichscommissariat «Ukraine» (1941 – 1944 rr.). Istoriia povsiakdennosti: teoriia ta praktyka: materialy Vseukr. nauk. konf. (The History of Everyday Life: Theory and Practice «: Materials by All. sciences Conf). Pereiaslav–Khmelnytskyi, 14–15 trav. 2010 r. Pereiaslav–Khmelnytskyi, 246. (in Ukr.)
Honcharenko O. (2012). Everyday life of the local population of the Reichskommissariat «Ukraine» in the context of the functioning of the occupational system of civil courts (1941–1944 rr.). Istoriia povsiakdennosti: teoriia ta praktyka: materialy Vseukr. nauk. konf., (The History of Everyday Life: Theory and Practice: Materials by All. sciences Conf). 5 – 6 oct. 2012. Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi,. 99–105. (in Ukr.)
Honcharenko O. (2009). Criminal law as a means of regulating the behavior of the local population of the Reichskommissariat «Ukraine»: review of the regulatory framework and jurisprudence (1941–1944 rr.). Naukovi zapysky z ukrainskoi istorii: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. (Scientific notes on Ukrainian history: Collection of scientific works). Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi. 23, 120–126. (in Ukr.)
Honcharenko O. (2009). Application of elements of Soviet legislation in the administrative and administrative practice of the institutions of the Reichskommissariat «Ukraine» at the initial stage of the formation of the Nazi occupation regime: a problem setting (the second half of 1941 – the beginning of 1942). Chasopys ukrainskoi istorii (A journal of Ukrainian history). Kyiv, 18, 163–165. (in Ukr.)
Honcharenko O. (2011). Ukrainian peace courts in the system of justice bodies of the Nazi occupation apparatus of power of the Reichskommissariat «Ukraine»: organizational structure, service competence and main content of activity (1941–1944 rr.). Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu. Seriia: Istorychni nauky. (Bulletin of Cherkasy University. Series: Historical Sciences). Cherkasy. 202. II. 36–41. (in Ukr.)
Honcharenko O. (2014). Problems of the functioning of local judicial institutions of the Reichskommissariat «Ukraine» in 1941–1944: contemporary Ukrainian historiography. Naukovi zapysky z ukrainskoi istorii. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats (Pages of Military History of Ukraine: Collection of Sciences. articles). Pereiaslav – Khmelnytskyi, 35, 195–201. (in Ukr.)
Honcharenko O. (2011). Functioning of the occupational administration of the Reichskommissariat «Ukraine»: administrative and administrative and organizational-legal aspects (1941–1944 rr.). Kyiv, 600. (in Ukr.)
Honcharenko O. M., Kunytskyi M. P., Lysenko O. Ie. (2014). The system of local government bodies on the territory of the Rayhskommissariat «Ukraine» and «military zone». 1941–1944 rr. / NAN Ukrainy. In-t istorii Ukrainy. Kyiv, 151. (in Ukr.)
Kunytskyi M. (2014). Operation of sifters and patrons in the regions of the Reichskommissariat «Ukraine»: analysis of judicial practice (1941–1944 rr.). Chasopys ukrainskoi istorii (A journal of Ukrainian history). Kyiv. 29, 29–33. (in Ukr.)
Shaikan, V. O. (2007). State of the system of justice in the territory of the Reichskommissariat «Ukraine» and the military zone during the Nazi occupation. Storinky voiennoi istorii Ukrainy: Zb. nauk. Statei (Pages of Military History of Ukraine: Collection of Sciences. articles). Kyiv. 11. 250. (in Ukr.)
Levchenko Yu. I. (2011). The judicial apparatus of the German administrative-territorial units of Ukraine for the years of occupation 1941–1944 rr. Visnyk akademii pratsi i sotsialnykh vidnosyn federatsii profspilok Ukrainy. Naukovyi zbirnyk. Seriia: Polityka, istoriia, kultura (Herald of the Academy of Labor and Social Relations of the Federation of Trade Unions of Ukraine. Scientific collection). 4 (60). 115–120. (in Ukr.)
Oliinyk Yu.V. (2004). Establishment of judicial bodies in the occupied territory of Ukraine during the Second World War. Istoriia Ukrainy. Malovidomi imena, podii, fakty (Zbirnyk statei). (History of Ukraine. Little-known names, events, facts). 26, 245–252. (in Ukr.)
Proyekty vremennykh ugolovnykh. Ugolovno-protsessualnykh i drugikh yuridicheskikh pravil g. Kiyeva. KODA (Kyivskyi oblasnyi derzhavnyi arkhiv.) F. 2412 (0085). Оp. 2. Spr. 47. 31 may 1942. 117 p. (in Russ.)
- There are currently no refbacks.