Ethnic interpretations of «Slavic» archaeological cultures in modern belarusian historiography

Kostiantyn Ivangorodsky

Abstract


Introduction. Modern Belarusian researchers analyze the problem of ancient Slavs, primarily as a component of Belarusian ethnogenesis. At the same time, the conceptual and terminological uncertainty of the ethnic content and essence of the «Slavs» concept is still present in such Belarusian specialists’ studios. This situation forces some authors to deny the Belarusian ethnic group Slavic identity and to construct the Baltic ethnicity for them. Most researchers consider the problem of settling the Slavs in the Belarusian territories more considerably. There is a rather broad chronological range of this process from the Bronze Age till the 10 century AD.

The purpose of this article is to analyze ethnic interpretations of several archaeological cultures in the first half of the 1st millennium AD. Concepts are controversial in the research space of contemporary Belarusian historiography. Archeological cultures are defined by specialists and as Slavic, Baltic, and as symbiotic communities, which specifics have already defined the modern Belarusian ethnic identity in the future.

Results. We are talking about the archaeological cultures such as Zarubyntsi, Postzarubinetska, Kolochyn, Bantserovshchyna-Tushemlya, Kyiv and Prague. Only the Prague culture population is clearly defined as purely Slavic by all researchers. Other cultures in the middle 1st millennium on the Belarus territory, in particular Kolochyn and Bantserovshchyna-Tushemlya, have three variants of ethnic interpretation – Slavic, Baltic, Balto-Slavic. It is complicated to define the «ethnic identity» of earlier cultures of the region – Mylograd, Zarubyntsi, Postzarubinetska, Kyiv, Penkiv.

Most of archaeological monuments on the Belarus territory, related to «Slavic question», is still at the initial stage of studying. In Belarusian historiography is still present the inertia to connect all the monuments from the 1st millennium with the Slavic ethnos. The insufficiency of a particular material is often replaced by artificial ethno-historical constructions. The most problematic component in this perspective is no linguistic provenness of relation to the Slavic archeological cultures. Ethnic interpretations of the «Slavic» archaeological cultures in modern Belarus historiography are presented by such scholars as E. Zagarulsky, A. Medvedev, L. Pobol, S. Rassadin, V. Viarhei, G. Shtykhow, A. Egoreychenko, O. Levko, V. Belyavets, O. Makushnikov and others concepts.

Conclusion. Thus has developed the rather difficult situation in regard to the ethnic interpretation of most archeological cultures that took place in the territory of Belarus during the first half of the 1st millennium AD. Some of them are estimated by archaeologists exclusively monoethnically – purely Slavic or Baltic. But some of these interpretations make us to see in such antiquities forms of the Balto-Slavic ethnocultural (sometimes only ethnically) symbiosis, which have created the Belarusian ethnic specificity at the level of modern ethnos.


Keywords


modern Belarusian historiography, archeological culture, ethnic interpretations, Slavs, ethnogenesis.

References


Zahorulsky, E. (2012). The Slavs: origin and settlement in Belarus. Minsk (in Russ.)

Miadzvedzew, A. (1994). About the time of arrival of the Slavs on the territory of Belarus (to the problem). In The historical science and historical education in Belarus (new concepts and approaches), 1, 19-24. Minsk (in Belar.)

Miadzvedzew, A (1994). The population of Belarus in the Iron Age (VIII century BC – VIII century AD), Belarusian historical review, 1, 15-37. Minsk (in Belar.)

Pobol, L. (2004). Antiquities of Turov region. Minsk (in Russ.)

Ablomski, A. & Gavrytuhin, I. (2011). The Slavs. In T. Bialova (Ed.). Archeology of Belarus: Encyclopedia, vol. 2, 299-301. Minsk (in Belar.)

Rassadin, S. (2008). The First Slavs. Slavogenesis. Minsk (in Russ.)

Shtyhaw, G. (1992). Kryvichy. Based on materials from the excavations of burial mounds in North Belarus. Minsk (in Belar.)

Quoted from: Egoreychenko, A. (2006). International Scientific Conference «Eastern Europe in Antiquity and the Middle Ages». In U. Korshuk (Ed.). Works of the Faculty of History, vol. 1, 274-277. Minsk (in Russ.)

Zverugo, Y. (1989). Upper Neman region in the IX-XIII centuries. Minsk (in Russ.)

Bialitskaya, G. (2009). Zarubintsy culture. In T. Bialova (Ed.). Archeology of Belarus: Encyclopedia, vol. 1, 355-360. Minsk (in Belar.)

Levko, O. (2004). Foreword, 5-10. In Pobol, L. (2004). Antiquities of Turov region. Minsk (in Russ.)

Rogalev, A. (1994). White Russia and Byelorussians: In Search of Origins. Gomel. (in Russ.)

Rogalev, A. (1996). Ethnic and geographical names as a source for the study of ethno-linguistic history (on the material of Belarus). Thesis of doctor of sciences (philology). Minsk (in Russ.)

Makushnikov, O. (2002). Gomel from ancient times to the end of the XVIII century. Historical and local history essay. Gomel (in Russ.)

Egoreychenko, A. (1996). The oldest settlements of Belarusian Polissya (VII-VI centuries BC - ІІ century AD). Minsk (in Russ.)

Nosevich, V. (2010). The main landmarks of ethnogenesis of Belarusians. In A. Taras (Ed.). Prehistory of Belarusians from ancient times to the XIII century. Minsk (in Russ.)

Titov, V. (2011). Ethnic situation on the territory of Belarus in the Iron Age, Dedy: Digest of publications about the Belarusian history, 6, 44-59. Minsk (in Russ.)

Levko O. (2004). Medieval territorial administrative centers of North-Eastern Belarus: formation and development. Minsk (in Russ.)

Belevets, V. (2012). The problem of isolating monuments of the Late Zarubinets circle in the Belorussian Pripyat Polissya. In A. Naumov (Ed.). Forest and forest-steppe zones of Eastern Europe in the epochs of Roman influences and the Great Migrations of Peoples, 3, 281-305. Tula (in Russ.)

Belyavets, V. (2017). Polesie lies plenty of secrets (Interview with O. Zaleschuk) [Electron resource]. Retrievid from http://prosvit.org/2017/09/11. (in Belar.)

Viarhei, V. Kalasowski, Y. (2009). Kiev Culture. In T. Bialova (Ed.). Archeology of Belarus: Encyclopedia, vol. 1, 441-444. Minsk (in Belar.)

Miadzvedzew, A (1999). Kiev Culture. In V. Shadyra, V. Viarhey (Ed.). Archeology of Belarus, vol. 2: The Iron Age and the early Middle Ages, 290-298. Minsk (in Belar.)

Temushev, S. (2008). The beginning of Rus’: the genesis of statehood in sources and historical tradition. Minsk (in Russ.)

Bychkov, A. (2010). Slavs, who are you and where from? In A. Taras (Ed.). Prehistory of Belarusians from ancient times to the XIII century. Minsk (in Russ.)

Viarhei, V. (1999). Monuments of Prague-Korczak and Luka-Raykovetska types. In V. Shadyra, V. Viarhey (Ed.). Archeology of Belarus, vol. 2: The Iron Age and the early Middle Ages, 317-348. Minsk (in Belar.)


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Archive
2014 22   29 Том 328
2015 9   22 29
2016 1   02 3-4
2017 1 2 3 4
2018 1 2 3-4

User

Journal Content

Browse

Language