PROBLEM OF AGRONOMIC PERSONNEL INTERACTION WITH OBJECTS OF AGRO-CULTURAL INFLUENCE IN THE UKRAINIAN SSR IN PERIOD OF THE «NEP»
Introduction. One of the important directions of professional activity of agronomists of Soviet Ukraine in the period of the NEP was interaction with the subjects of economic activity. It consisted first of all in serving the interests of peasant farms, establishing and establishing various cooperative forms of cooperation and collective farming. This, on the one hand, would accelerate the modernization of agricultural production, and on the other hand, a high level of employment of agronomists in the labor market was ensured.
Purpose. The problem of the professional activity of the agrarian workers of the Ukrainian SSR in the era of the NEP in contemporary historiography is presented less ideologically veiled and more complete than in previous historiographical periods. Some of her subjects are presented on the pages of monographs, collective works, encyclopaedias, dissertation researches, generalization works on agrarian subjects. The purpose of the article is to research the cooperation of agronomic workers with peasant farms, cooperative organizations, collective farms, and land communities during the NEP period.
Methods. Agronomists are considered on the one hand as intellectuals, and on the other hand they’re viewed as independent professional group. In any case they arouse interest if only because they played fundamental role in society and possessed high social rank.
Results. Significant role in conducting agronomic work in the period of the NEP
belonged to the land authorities. Their attention is mainly focused on servicing the peasant individual farms. As a result, the nature of the work of agronomists was known a certain part of the peasantry, first of all «middle peasants». In public сonsciousness of farmers prevailed positive attitude to agronomists.
The development of new forms of management contributed to the expansion of the circle the cooperation of agronomists and the demand for them on the labor market. Important place belonged to agricultural cooperation, which managed to own attract a significant amount of agronomists. The latter concentrated their own work in separate sectors of the peasant farms served relevant special cooperative societies. Agronomists fulfilled their duties on an ongoing basis in specific economic associations and responded to them for the results agrobusiness questions about their own regular agronomists were violated also collective farms and land communities. Initiation of land institutions, without doubt, showed the awareness of the needs of landowners in agronomic service and recognition of the important role of agronomists in economic life.
Tsomra, T. S., (2007). Rural intelligentsia USSR and its impact on culture and development of the productive forces in the Ukrainian village day NEP. Thesis candidate hist. sciences: 07.00.01 History of Ukraine; Cherkasy: Cherkasy B. Khmelnitsky National University. Cherkasy (in Ukr.).
Dorosh, T. (2010). Agrarian intellectuals of Soviet Ukraine (20-ies. XX century.): socio-historical perspective. Thesis candidate hist. sciences: 07.00.01 History of Ukraine; Lugansk: Shidnoukr. National University named Dal (in Ukr.).
Lazurenko, V. M. (2013). Ukrainian farming: the rise and fall (1921–1929). – Cherkasy: Cherkasy State Technological University (in Ukr.).
Slisarenko, O. (1924). Regional agronomy and administrative areas. Agronomist, 1, 16-18 (in Ukr.).
Duz-Kriatchenko, D. (1928). Increase agricultural production and practice of agrobusiness. Ukrainian agronomist, 9, 63-67. (in Ukr.).
Kuzmenko, P. (1924). About agronomic work in the village (materials on issues of local agronomic work in Ukraine). Landowner, 2, 33-36. (in Ukr.).
SAMR. F. P-54. Op.21. Case 209. 11 pgs. (in Rus.).
Grigorovich, A. (1929). Peasants about agronomists. Agronomist, 1, 2-4. (in Ukr.).
(1924). Our wills. Soviet peasant, 1, 16-17. (in Ukr.).
Tovkach, P. (1925). Give the agronomist! Soviet peasant, 17-18, 56. (in Ukr.).
CSAPO. F.1. Op.20. Case 3013. 129 pgs. (in Ukr.).
Kohaniy, V. (1925). Agronomist-bathing. Soviet peasant, 19, 44. (in Ukr.).
(1929). Himself an agronomist. Ukrainian agronomist, 7-8, 91. (in Ukr.).
CSAHOP. F.27. Op.8. Case 969. 49 pgs. (in Ukr.).
Rumiantsiv, V. (1928). On the question of the effectiveness of agrobusiness in the countryside. Ukrainian agronomist, 7-8, 81-83. (in Ukr.).
Galayba, F. (1923). Agriculturist activity of agricultural co-operation. Agronomist, 1, 36-38. (in Ukr.).
Schadylov, O. (1923). Modern issues of agronomy. Agronomist, 4, 25-29. (in Ukr.).
Maluga, M. (1925). Collections in system f.d. co-operation. Landowner, 1, 12-17. (in Ukr.).
Demchenko, L. (1927). Collective holdings organize collective agronomy. Soviet peasant, 5, 34-35. (in Ukr.).
Lihosherst, Yu. (1926). Public moments in the work of agronomists of co-operation and trusts. Ukrainian agronomist, 12, 29-30. (in Ukr.).
Shahiv, Ye. (1927). About agronomy of land communities. Ukrainian agronomist, 7-8, 60-62. (in Ukr.).
Krasnoyaruzhskiy, S. (1927). About cooperative agronomy. Ukrainian agronomist, 9, 38-39. (in Ukr.).
(1927). About cooperative agronomy. Ukrainian agronomist, 12, 33-35. (in Ukr.).
Tankov, O. (1929). Agro-personnel and increase of agricultural productivity. Ukrainian agronomist, 6, 53-57. (in Ukr.).
- There are currently no refbacks.