The experience of defining the «historical source» notion from the position of philosophical hermeneutics

A. Lukashevich

Abstract


Introduction. The notional apparatus of historical science can serve cognitional purposes if it is renewed, modified each time when new empirical data, theoretical and methodological concepts appear. Due to this the phenomenon of digital heritage, non-classic scientific paradigm actualization, spreading of functional aims are considered as suppositions to re-comprehend the key notion of humanitarian knowledge – «historical source». The basis of the offered experience to formulate the notion is searching the ways to get over the logical contradiction: on the one hand, between polysubjective pole of historical cognition which is conditioned by the context in which historians are positioned and get their own results of research, and on the other hand, the research practice object – the primary source which in concrete cognitive situation is single, unchangeable conclusion and thus conditioning the only one true independent of experiencing subject.

Purpose. Proceeding from the idea of the subject-object nature of the origin and existence of the historical source we will try to ground our version of defining the notion «historical source» which takes into account the specific features of a new historical source – digital heritage, and also the vitality of non-classic scientific paradigm.

Results. Historical source is the result and inheritance of the subject-object interaction of socio-cultural and natural and climatic processes that are developing in space and time. It is the fragmental expression of the past in the present; it is a part of the whole that remained as a result of natural selection out of the totality of historical sources of certain historical epochs or purposeful activity of a human being to preserve it as a scientific and cultural value.

Conclusion. Historical sources serve as a basis of humanitarian cognition as they contain significant scientific information. But, their application does not remove the problem of relativism and subjectivism received as a result of researching the knowledge of the past conditioned by gnosiological relativism (of conditions, factors, cognitive activity process) and ontological relativism (changeability of the observation object as it is seen from the example of electronic and digital inheritance). It remains to be complicated and getting over the subject-object opposition in explaining the notion of «historical source» which showed dynamism of «life cycle» of the sources.

The relative is senseless without the absolute, in this case without «the constant» of the historical source. But it only limits the interpretation of the historical source content and provides the «experiment» repetition. That is why it can be concluded that historical sources can play their part only when they are «mounted» into a certain system of historical conclusion proofs which contains ,besides them, concrete historical concept, methods and criteria of research, theoretical and methodological basis, ways of revising the received results.

We think that the offered definition of the «historical source» notion can serve getting over logical contradiction between polysubjective side of historical cognition and its object – historical source, as not only the subject that gets knowledge but also its research object are constantly developing.

Keywords


«historical source» notion, the digital heritage, philosophical hermeneutics, the subject-object relations, interpretation, subjectivity, objectivity

References


References

Edmondson, Ray. (2002). Memory of the World: General Guidelines. Paris: UNESCO, 2002. 72. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001256/125637e.pdf. (in Russ.).

Adopted at the 32nd session of the General Conference of UNESCO (2003, 17 October). Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/digital_heritage_charter.shtml(in Russ.).

Report by the director-general on a draft charter on the preservation of the digitalheritage (2002). Rezyume 09.04.2002. Retrieved from http://www.ifap.ru/events/ev0203c.htm. (in Russ.).

Baeva, L.V. (2013). Electronic culture: experience of the philosophical analysis] Voprosy filosofii /dalee – VF (Philosophy questions /Next Pq/). 5, 75-83. (in Russ.).

Zlobin, E.V. (2003). About some problems of the categorizations and descriptions electronic documents as historical source. The circle of ideas: the electronic resources of historical information: Proceedings of the VIII Conference of the Association «History and Computer». Moscow, Barnaul, 7-36. Retrieved from http://www.runetica.com/pdfs/reader/ZlobinEV.pdf (in Russ.).

Yushin, I.V. (2003). Electronic documents as historical source. The circle of ideas: the electronic resources of historical information: Proceedings of the VIII Conference of the Association «History and Computer». Moscow, Barnaul, 37-49. Retrieved from http://www.runetica.com/pdfs/reader/YuschinIF.pdf (in Russ.).

Tikhonov, V.I. (2006). Organization of archive keeping electronic documents. Proceedings of the IV All-Russian conference «Effective electronic document management in the public administration». Moscow, April 26-27. Retrieved from http://www.aik-sng.ru/text/krug/2005/393-435.pdf(in Russ.).

Gritsevich, V.P., Kaun, S.B., Khodin, S.N. (2000). Theory and history of the source criticism. Minsk, Belarusian State University. (In Russ.).

Kalakura, Ya.S. Voitsekhіvs’ka, І.N. Korolev B.I. (2002). The historical sourcecriticism. Kyiv: Lybid, 2002. (In Ukr.).

Golikov, A.G., Kruglova, T.A. (2010). The source criticism ofthenational history. Moscow: Academy. (In Russ.).

Rumyantseva, M.F. (2014). The historical source. The Theory and methodology of the history science: The Terminological dictionary Chubarayn, A.O. (Ed.). Moscow: Acvilon. (In Russ.).

Chechenkov, P.V. (2012) Document and historical source: on crossroad social-humanitarian sciences. Vestnik NGTU im. R.E. Alekseeva «Upravlenie v sotsial’nykh sistemakh». Kommunikativnye tekhnologii» (Vestnik NGTU by R.E. Alekseeva «Management in social system». Communication technologies), 4, 36-45. Retrieved from http://cyberleninka.ru/article/h/document-i-istoricheskiy-istochnik-na-perekrestke-sotsialno-gumanitarnyh-nauk (in Russ.).

Illeritskaya, N.V. (2013). Design of the past in a context of intellectual variety. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Politologiya. Sotsial’no-kommunikativnye nauki» (Vestnik RGGU. The series «Political science. Social-communication sciences»). Мoscow, 1(102), 36-48. (In Russ.).

Khvostova, K.V. (2014). The modern nonclassical paradigm and history science. Voprosy filosofii (Philosophy questions). 10, 25-36. Retrieved from http://vpil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1031&ltemid=52(in Russ.).

Gadamer, G.-G. (1991). A esthetics and hermeneutics. The Relevance of the Beautiful. Мoscow. (In Russ.).

Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). Text problem in linguistics, philology and other humanities. Literary-critical articles. Moscow, 1986. (In Russ.).

Gadamer, G.-G. (1988). Truth and method. Мoscow: Progress, 704. (in Russ.).

Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). Notes. Literary-critical articles. Moscow. (In Russ.).

Lektorskii, V.A. (2001). The classical epistemology and the nonclassical. Moscow: Editorial URSS. (in Russ.).

Finn V.K. (2011). Knowledge of the past in modern culture (material «round table»). Voprosy filosofii (Philosophy questions), 2011, 8. Retrieved from http://vphil.ru/index.pxp?option=com_content&task=view&id=362&itemid=52(in Russ.).

Ferraris, M. (2014). What is new realism? Voprosy filosofii (Philosophy questions). 8, 145-159. Retrieved from http://vphil.ru/index.pxp?option=com_content&task=view&id=1002(in Russ.).

Bart, R. (1989). Elected works: Semiology: Poetics. Moscow. (In Russ.).


Full Text: PDF (Українська)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Archive
2014 22   29 Том 328
2015 9   22 29
2016 1   02 3-4
2017 1 2 3 4
2018 1 2 3-4

User

Journal Content

Browse

Language